Whew........that was a close call.
As most of you are aware, an earthquake struck the eastern half of the United States. The epicenter was in the vicinity of Mineral, Virginia. The strength estimated to be between 5.8 and 5.9 on
the Richter Scale.
Let's face it, 5.8 on the Richter Scale is in no way a catastrophe. It's going to knock some stuff over, crack some mortar, and maybe flip a trailer or two.
So why was it such big news?
Because it struck in the region where there a large reporting outlets, namely Washington, D.C., Philadelphia, and New York City.
Where was I during all this commotion?
I was in the bathroom, brushing my teeth and getting ready for a shower.
To be precise, I was leaning over the sink expelling the toothpaste from my mouth.
All of a sudden, the house began to sway a little. My first thought was that I was experiencing a touch of vertigo. However, when I stood up straight the medicine cabinet mirror was moving.
I've been through enough small tremors to realize it was a very small earthquake.
Christine was up at the Library for a meeting. I shot her a quick text, returned to the bathroom for my shower, and thought nothing further of the event.
Besides, I was heading out to meet up with a friend for a couple of beers and some small talk.
It wasn't until I turned on my car radio that I realized a media feeding frenzy was in it's early stages.
Media feeding frenzies are one of my pet peeves. Sensationalism sells. In no month of the year is that more true than the month of August. Most, if not all, of the politicians are out of the nation's capital on vacation. When all the vitriol and name calling are removed from D.C., the media outlets are left with very little to actually report on.
It only took a couple of minutes to get to the tavern.
The televisions were up loud. I thought, "Aw crap. I'm going to have to listen to this all afternoon.". Sure enough, the local ABC affiliate had "BREAKING NEWS" coverage of "Earthquake 2011".
Facts were scarce in the early hours of the reports. I've seen enough "breaking news" coverage to know that when facts are scarce, the first thing the news organizations are going to do is send a cameraman and reporter out into the street. They also send along a slew of inane questions so that they can record every slack jawed local's take on the event.
In this case, the local station did not let it's loyal viewership down. They grabbed a guy in a suit and tie and asked him where he was when the earthquake hit. For Christ's sake, they just saw him walk out of an office building. "I was in my office when it hit.", I muttered to myself.
"I was in my office when it hit.", came the fellow's response.
I muttered, "Were you scared when it hit?".
"Were you afraid when the earthquake hit?", the eagle eyed reporter asked.
I turned away from the television. The ridiculous line of questions was starting to make me nauseous.
One game of pinball and a few minutes later, the street reporter had just stopped some guy on a bike.
Once again I muttered, "Where were you when the earthquake hit?".
Sure enough, that was the question.
I said out loud this time, "He was on his f%ing bicycle you jackass!".
Of course he was.
The station had reporters out and about gathering up news for other reports. That meant they could ask people all over the Delaware Valley the same questions over and over and over again.
It was excruciating to watch and listen to.
Especially for people like me. I'm a "fact driven" sort. I want to know what happened where.
I don't want to listen to the guy who opens up his take on the situation with the phrase, "I SAW IT ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!".
"I SAW IT ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!" is usually followed by a finger point at the camera, the line, "IS THAT THING ON?????????????", a goofy wide eyed smile, and a, "HI MOM!!!!".
Yet, most news organizations always seem to find that guy.
The other thing I can't stand is the guy walking behind the interview who suddenly realizes he's on camera.
Pretty soon, one of those idiots came on the screen. The coverage had changed over to the national feed. Some reporter was standing in front of an office building in Washington, D.C.. Some Arabic guy in full Arabic regalia, turban and all, was behind the reporter. He was waiving at the camera and talking excitedly on his phone. It's likely that he was talking to his turban headed friends or family.
Regardless, I sat there just hoping......no, praying that some good Samaritan would "Clothesline" they guy just on the principle of the thing.
That, my friends, would win an Emmy.
It was getting late in the afternoon and I had to pick up some stuff for dinner. Christine had another meeting to go to so I wouldn't be cooking much. I turned the radio on to the local NPR station. At least if all I was going to hear about was the earthquake, it would be sans the sensationalism.
The facts were finally starting to filter out across the nation.
The earthquake had struck in a rural part of Virginia. Damage was slight. There were no reported deaths. A couple of nuclear generating plants had gone off line like they were designed to do. Airports in the wake of the earthquake were temporarily closed as a precaution.
That's the sort of stuff I want to hear. Facts.
Now it wouldn't be America if there wasn't somebody making fun of the event.
"Best Punchline Delivered During Earthquake 2011" goes to the guy who said this:
"That was an earthquake? I thought it was (New Jersey)Governor Christie jumping into the Presidential race."
That's funny no matter where you're from.
Just a couple post earthquake thoughts.
Let's start with the reaction to the earthquake from our friends out there is Southern California.
This headline pretty much says it all. While it is true that California has much more experience with earthquakes of devastating magnitudes, I'd like to see how well they'd fare in a Category 1 or 2 hurricane. While the East Coast buildings are generally inferior seismically to California buildings, the California drainage systems aren't built to handle the water volumes associated with hurricanes. More importantly, evacuating Los Angeles would prove monumental given the sheer number of people and given their inexperience in evacuations. Mark my words, one of these days a big storm is going to hit Southern California. It will not be a pretty sight.
Now then, the overreaction by the East Coast media. For God's sake media people! There's enough really scary crap going on out there without you folks trying to amp it up some more for the sake of ratings. By the time the "quake" reached Philadelphia, and New York City, the force had waned considerably. Sure, it was a rare occurrence, but for f#ck's sake use some sound judgement. Gather the facts, get on the air, and report them to the general populace without all the histrionics. Are sound judgement and common sense so rare in reporting that it has become easy to dismiss them as necessities?
Hurricane Irene is scheduled to make her appearance on the Eastern seaboard this weekend. I'm not looking forward to either the storm nor the over the top reporting.
Three things you are guaranteed to see this weekend in regards to the storm:
- A report on the fools who choose to stay in the path of the storm citing the other storms they've survived.
- Lots of pictures of fishing piers taken during the storm. Expect more than a few to collapse.
- Some clown from
The Weather Channel wearing a rain slicker reporting from the landfall of Hurricane Irene.
Maybe I'll just listen to NPR all weekend instead.
Until the next time, all y'all take care of yourselves.
Air Traffic Mike, ret.